Re: Que faut-il penser de la nouvelle courbe en crosse de hockey du 6e rapport du GIEC

Liste des GroupesRevenir à fs environnement 
Sujet : Re: Que faut-il penser de la nouvelle courbe en crosse de hockey du 6e rapport du GIEC
De : artichoke (at) *nospam* jerusalem.invalid (Topinambour)
Groupes : fr.soc.environnement
Date : 17. May 2022, 04:26:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Guest of ProXad - France
Message-ID : <628307c1$0$26337$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Le 16/05/2022 à 22:27, bilou a écrit :
On 13/05/2022 12:53, PaulAubrin wrote:

>

climateaudit.prout

Pour moi un scientifique qui parle de "courbe en crosse de hockey"
c'est un guignol de même quand il mesure les superficies en
"terrains de football".
Extrait wikipédia sur l'individu en question:
-------------
McIntyre started work for Noranda[1] and worked for 30 years in the mineral business,[2] the last part of these in the hard-rock mineral exploration as an officer or director of several public mineral exploration companies.[3] [4] He was the president and founder of Northwest Exploration Company Limited and a director of its parent company, Northwest Explorations Inc. When Northwest Explorations Inc. was taken over in 1998 by CGX Resources Inc. to form the oil and gas exploration company CGX Energy Inc., McIntyre ceased being a director. McIntyre was a strategic advisor for CGX in 2000 through 2003.[5] McIntyre says that during his career his skills in statistical analysis enabled him to analyse mineral prospecting data and out-bet his rivals.[6] He also occasionally worked as a government policy analyst, including a period at the federal Anti-Inflation Board.[1]

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 May 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal