Re: From the Archives .....

The idiot insisted:

In article <v0dlnh$315k9$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

The unTrue Doctor has no idea about truth:
 

 
To anyone watching the episode who has never watched Doctor Who before,
and doesn't recognize Pertwee let along Hartnell it's made obvious from
the start that when Tom Baker's face is not on the screen then he's
losing to Morbius and the intention of the director and original script
writer is that all the faces the viewer does not recognize are those
generated by Morbius of himself as he appeared in the past and in
disguise, since it's clearly not Tom Baker.
 

 
If the faces are Morbius, why is he in Victorian/Edwardian clothes
of the sort associated with the Doctor? Why isn’t he in Time
Lord robes?
 
You say he’s ‘in disguise’ but that disguise would make him
stick out like a sore thumb (maybe even two or three sore thumbs)
on Gallifrey. Just who is he supposed to be disguised as, and why?
 

 
4 Doctors Face and the rest are Morbius.
 
Logical.
 

No. The logical conclusion was:

4 Doctors, 2 Morbius faces and the rest are just fake images.

(I can talk you through the logic step by step if you like.)

However, the production teams aren’t logical, so the logical explanation
is (unfortunately) just plain wrong. Those faces are the Doctor’s
even though logically they shouldn’t be.

(Insert ‘wrong with authority’ quote here.)

--
solar penguin