Re: Young people peering

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ns nntp 
Sujet : Re: Young people peering
De : eagle (at) *nospam* eyrie.org (Russ Allbery)
Groupes : news.admin.peering news.software.nntp
Date : 19. Apr 2024, 01:52:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The Eyrie
Message-ID : <8734rib55c.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
SugarBug <3883@sugar.bug> writes:
Russ Allbery <eagle@eyrie.org> wrote:

The parents who think their children should have reasonable Internet
access tend to get out-shouted by the parents who think that any
exposure to parentally unapproved material may transform their precious
17-year-olds into hardened criminals or damned atheists.

"Reasonable internet access ..."

Excuse me while I hysterically laugh myself to death!

There is no level of "reasonable internet access" for anyone under the
age of 40. No psyche is left undamaged by even brief exposure to
cyberspace. I'm certain the Usenet trolls already proved that at least
two decades ago.

Well, yes, deciding the Internet was a bad idea and no one should use it
is also a position one could have.  :)  Some days I'd even agree with you!

I'm pretty sure it's also pretty bad for people over 40 years old.  There
is a brief moment on your 40th birthday when the Internet is safe and you
should treasure it.  Retroactively if necessary.

--
Russ Allbery (eagle@eyrie.org)             <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

          Please post questions rather than mailing me directly.
     <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering74The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering29Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering24The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering22Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering10Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering6The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering30The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  `* Re: Young people peering29Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24   `* Re: Young people peering28Retro Guy
19 Apr 24    +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24    i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24    `* Re: Young people peering24The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24     i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24     i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24     i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering18Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i`* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)17The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     i +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i i+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     i i+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24     i ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     i ii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24     i ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24     i ii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     i ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     i i`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24     i i +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     i i `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24     i +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24     i `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     `- Re: Young people peering1yeti

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal