Re: Young people peering

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ns nntp 
Sujet : Re: Young people peering
De : gtaylor (at) *nospam* tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor)
Groupes : news.admin.peering news.software.nntp
Date : 19. Apr 2024, 16:33:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : TNet Consulting
Message-ID : <uvtvc3$tkt$3@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/19/24 02:12, Marco Moock wrote:
Until they heard of SSL-VPN (via TCP port 443). That can be easily implemented in ocserv on Linux and looks like normal web traffic.
Except for the fact that the school used a TLS bumping proxy and you couldn't initiate TLS traffic without passing through the bumping proxy.   The bumping proxy could effectively block TLS VPNs.
Access to the Internet is not the same as being on the Internet.  The school computers had access to the Internet.  Access that was easily filtered / blocked.
Trying to usurp the filtering garnered an unpleasant conversation.
It was more pleasant to try to connect to a site, find out it was blocked, fill out the form to request it be unblocked, and follow the process.
Sometimes they would allow a student to use a teacher's computer (or the teacher could sign in to a student computer / proxy) and the teacher could supervise what the student was doing.
It worked well, it provided the desired access to the Internet, and it provided a reasonable amount of protection using the technology available at the time.
--
Grant. . . .

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Apr 24 * Young people peering74The Doctor
14 Apr 24 +- Re: Young people peering1Marco Moock
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering5Retro Guy
14 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering3Grant Taylor
14 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Young people peering2rek2 hispagatos
19 Apr 24 ii `- Re: Young people peering1dgold
15 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
14 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Stefan Ram
15 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering2candycanearter07
15 Apr 24 i `- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering3Niklas H
15 Apr 24 i+- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
15 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering2John Levine
16 Apr 24 i`- Re: Young people peering1David Ritz
16 Apr 24 +* Re: Young people peering29Kyonshi
16 Apr 24 i+* Re: Young people peering24The Doctor
17 Apr 24 ii+* Re: Young people peering22Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iii+* Re: Young people peering10Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii+* Re: Young people peering3Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiiii`* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
17 Apr 24 iiiii `- Re: Young people peering1Retro Guy
17 Apr 24 iiii`* Re: Young people peering6The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii +* Re: Young people peering4Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 iiii i+* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iiii ii`- Re: Young people peering1rek2 hispagatos
17 Apr 24 iiii i`- Re: Young people peering1The Doctor
17 Apr 24 iiii `- Re: Young people peering1SugarBug
18 Apr 24 iii`* Re: Young people peering11candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii `* Re: Young people peering10Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii  `* Re: Young people peering9candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii   `* Re: Young people peering8Retro Guy
18 Apr 24 iii    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
18 Apr 24 iii    `* Re: Young people peering6Grant Taylor
18 Apr 24 iii     +* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     i`* Re: Young people peering2SugarBug
19 Apr 24 iii     i `- Re: Young people peering1Russ Allbery
19 Apr 24 iii     `* Re: Young people peering2Marco Moock
19 Apr 24 iii      `- Re: Young people peering1Grant Taylor
17 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Young people peering1Kyonshi
17 Apr 24 i`* Re: Young people peering4Stefan Ram
18 Apr 24 i `* Re: Young people peering3Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Apr 24 i  `* Re: Young people peering2Computer Nerd Kev
19 Apr 24 i   `- Re: Young people peering1Sn!pe
19 Apr 24 `* Re: Young people peering30The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
19 Apr 24  `* Re: Young people peering29Grant Taylor
19 Apr 24   `* Re: Young people peering28Retro Guy
19 Apr 24    +* Re: Young people peering2Ted Heise
20 Apr 24    i`- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
20 Apr 24    +- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24    `* Re: Young people peering24The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering4Marco Moock
20 Apr 24     i`* Re: Young people peering3Russ Allbery
21 Apr 24     i +- Re: Young people peering1Ross Finlayson
23 Apr 24     i `- Re: Young people peering1candycanearter07
20 Apr 24     +* Re: Young people peering18Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i`* [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)17The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     i +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.14Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i i+- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning
21 Apr 24     i i+* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.9Adam H. Kerman
21 Apr 24     i ii`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.8Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.7Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     i ii  +* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii  i`- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1D
21 Apr 24     i ii  `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.4Retro Guy
21 Apr 24     i ii   +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Sn!pe
21 Apr 24     i ii   `* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.2Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     i ii    `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     i i`* Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.3Imran Zukhova
22 Apr 24     i i +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Adam H. Kerman
22 Apr 24     i i `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile.1Mr Ön!on
21 Apr 24     i +- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1yeti
21 Apr 24     i `- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. (was Re: Young people peering)1Marco Moock
21 Apr 24     `- Re: Young people peering1yeti

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal