Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à as written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 20. Apr 2025, 17:07:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <d66a0klnjdbvngu1ktfi3uj1eocoeqoo7o@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:52:50 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 08:43:08 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:
>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:54:48 -0000 (UTC), Charles Packer
<mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote:
Sometimes empires just kind of fall apart over time--no catastrophe
required.
=20
https://reactormag.com/five-futures-where-the-us-ended-not-with-a-bang-
but-a-whimper/
>
Anybody planning to write a story about the splintering of North
America should note where the Canadian embassy is in Washington.
It was relocated to the foot of Capitol Hill in 1989.
>
In fairness Canada and the US have been "best buddies" pretty much
since 1815 - though no question our friend in the White House has
brought Canada-US relations to a 200 year low point in no more than
three months.
>
Buckle up! 45 months to go!
>
Or less, if congress does their constitutional duty, which
may not happen until after the midterms.

Actually, I think we need the /Republicans/ in Congress to do it.

With an assist from the Dems to convict in the Senate.

And language in the "to convict" proposition that also bars him from
public office, with no separate vote required. A separate vote would
allow the Republicans to convict but not bar.

Just to be sure no loopholes are left that might allow him to try
again on the grounds that he didn't get to serve the full four years.

This may seem unlikely, but it really is the only way to end the
madness. Of course, we would also have to avoid falling to the madness
of Bernie, his friends, and the various high-prestige schools that
think supporting terrorists (verbally) and chanting anti-Semitic
slogans (and, in some cases, taking physical action related to
anti-Semitism) is something they should encourage.

IOW, the only way out is for pretty much everyone to become sane
again. We can survive a few crazies on each side, locking them up when
they go beyond free speech to actually break laws. We can't lock up
half the country.

We need two Centrist parties, one slightly Right and one slightly
Left. One wonders if "Whigs" and "Tories" are available as Party
names.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper47James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper42Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper41Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper36Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii    `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper17Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper16James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper15Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper14Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii    +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper10Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii    i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii    i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii    i i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii    i i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
3 Jun06:42 i ii    i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
30 May 25 i ii    `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii     +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii     `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal