Re: Question about ISFDB statistic

Liste des GroupesRevenir à as written 
Sujet : Re: Question about ISFDB statistic
De : wthyde1953 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (William Hyde)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 13. Apr 2025, 19:42:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vth0jn$3gei5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Charles Packer wrote:
Why the wide swing in the number of titles in the ISFDB
by year of publication -- 50% jump -- from 1938 to 1939?
It's hard to believe that it reflects a step function in public
interest. The context is as follows:
 year 1936 count 4738
1937  4628
1938  4117
1939  6245
1940  6685
1941  5746
1942  5513
 
There was a bit of a boom in SF magazines about this time.  Unknown, for example, was launched in 1939 as were Startling Stories and Planet Stories.  I presume there were others I don't know about.
Secondary publication and reprints became more popular, as I mentioned elsewhere.
Pohl's two magazines at this time were launched in 1940, too late to account for the step function, but part of the 39-41 boom which came to an end due to wartime paper shortages.
William Hyde

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Apr 25 * Question about ISFDB statistic6Charles Packer
13 Apr 25 +* Re: Question about ISFDB statistic3Ahasuerus
13 Apr 25 i`* Re: Question about ISFDB statistic2William Hyde
14 Apr 25 i `- Re: Question about ISFDB statistic1Ahasuerus
13 Apr 25 `* Re: Question about ISFDB statistic2William Hyde
14 Apr 25  `- Re: Question about ISFDB statistic1Charles Packer

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal