Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024, William Hyde wrote:

Good. You make ... what, the third? ... that has come to my
attention.  In the past, when I've said this, what I've gotten
from the global warming folks in the conversation is "Noooooo,
nuclear is teh evulzzz!!!"

>
The people who speak in public about global climate change are seldom the people who work at the science. The same as with any other major issue.
>
We are not in general a charismatic bunch, we do not wow the audience with out speaking abilities (with a few exceptions like Asimov).  So the public face of the cause is people who are political.  And among that crowd, "nuclear" is almost an obscenity.

You need a PR consultant William. May I be of service (or rather, one of
my colleagues)? ;)

Hydro is great, but as has been pointed out, all the good
sites have been taken.

>
I am not at all sure this is true.  And yes, some dams were put in the wrong place and should be demolished (most of those do not produce power anyway).

This is the truth! I think there are plenty of areas on the planet which
are good for hydro.