Liste des Groupes | Revenir à as written |
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:46:55 +1100, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org>I think I read faster than average. I frequently get anoyed when shoulder browsing and people take way too long time to read through text on their computer.
wrote:
>On 14/02/25 08:21, D wrote:>On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Judith Latham wrote:>>Catch-22 by Joseph Heller>
Excellent! Will read again.
I did read it again, and was disappointed. Somehow, for me, it had lost
its air of originality. I'd almost classify it as a "read once" book.
Many of the other books on the list can be read with pleasure multiple
times.
"Read once" vs. "read multiple times" -
>
In my youth, almost every book of fiction was "read once".
I read fast, but I remembered large amounts word-for-word
and that made re-reading less pleasant. But I did develop a
habit of re-reading series, where the latter stories added
depth to what I had picked up on first-read.
>
I still read fast, which I've realized is often "too fast."
Especially, I still missed a lot of social interplay and clever
dialog, even though I try to pay more attention. These days,
I'll re-read a book within a few weeks if I did enjoy it.
>
Back in the early days when I seldom re-read, the one book
that fascinated me enough to re-read was "Cat's Cradle."
To my surprise, it did not surprise me at all -- it seemed to
evoke only the same insights and reactions that had impressed
me on the first reading.
>>>
Having said that, I still acknowledge that Catch-22 is an important
literary work. In fact, when I released my mailing list manager, I
called it MajorMajor.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.