Sujet : Re: Easiest Summer Reading List Ever!
De : tnusenet17 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tony Nance)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 21. May 2025, 18:31:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100l2ks$2ubig$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/21/25 12:55 PM, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <100kria$2r2j0$1@dont-email.me>,
Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com> wrote:
>
A national media conglomerate[1] put out a summer reading list, aided by
AI. But...
>
"In fact, only the last five of the 15 novels on the list are real."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chicago-sun-times-ai-reading-list/
>
Easiest, or... hardest?
I see your point, but optimist that I am, I'm gonna stick to "easiest".
For example:
- Since only 5 of them actually exist, you're done when you read those 5. If you want to read more than 5 books, you can choose whatever you want to read for book 6 and beyond.
- If you've been assigned this list for the summer[1], any reports you write for the 10 nonexistent ones will not have content mistakes![2]
Tony
[1] Back in the day, at least, some places used national/pre-packaged/external lists to assign summer reading - for example, say, lists that were provided by national media conglomerates.
[2] Though of course, everything else teachers evaluate is still fair game.