Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned

Chris Elvidge wrote:

On 30/05/2025 at 22:06, William Hyde wrote:

Sam Plusnet wrote:

On 30/05/2025 19:07, William Hyde wrote:

Scott Dorsey wrote:

J. J. Lodder <jjlxa32@xs4all.nl> wrote:

>
Yes. Freedom of religion is fine,
but freedom from religion is far more important,

>
In the end, they are really the same thing.  You don't get freedom to enjoy
your religion without the freedom from mine.
>
Far too many religious people don't understand this.  But of course many
of the people who founded the country were Puritans who moved to Holland to
enjoy religious freedom and discovered that they didn't actually want
religious freedom at all, so long as it meant freedom for others as well.

>
This is a facet of history that gets lost.
>
A number of "repressed" denominations were not seeking toleration, but domination.  I am not referring to any one group here - it might be the policy of one faction of religion X, but not of the rest.

>
I suppose it is understandable.
With the exception of The Netherlands, it was the usual practice for the Monarch or government to define the particular form of religion to be followed in their lands.

>
This was even defined as a principle "Cuius regio, eius religio" meaning "whose state, whose religion".  Though as originally formulated it applied only in Germany, and only to Lutheran or Catholic rulers, Calvinists need not apply.
>
This was actually an improvement on the previous rule, which was that everyone had to accept the religion of the emperor.  Under the new principle the official religion and that of the ruler were more likely to be the same.
>
Things got difficult in a state like Brandenburg, where the population was Lutheran but the ruler Calvinist.
>
>
>

They just wanted a place where they would be top dog.

>
They already had one: Scotland.
>
The parliamentary army was largely Quakers and other independent

 I thought Quakers were/are notoriously non-violent.

They didn't start that way.  It may be that the ultimate failure of the civil war had something to do with changing their minds.
William Hyde