Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"
De : 433-929-6894 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.c
Date : 07. Mar 2024, 18:35:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240307083119.850@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2024-03-07, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
On 06/03/2024 23:00, Michael S wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:28:59 +0000
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
 
>
"Rust uses a relatively unique memory management approach that
incorporates the idea of memory “ownership”. Basically, Rust keeps
track of who can read and write to memory. It knows when the program
is using memory and immediately frees the memory once it is no longer
needed. It enforces memory rules at compile time, making it virtually
impossible to have runtime memory bugs.⁴ You do not need to manually
keep track of memory. The compiler takes care of it."
>
This suggests the language automatically takes care of this.
 Takes care of what?
AFAIK, heap fragmentation is as bad problem in Rust as it is in
C/Pascal/Ada etc... In this aspect Rust is clearly inferior to GC-based
languages like Java, C# or Go.
 
Garbage collection does not stop heap fragmentation.  GC does, I suppose, mean that you need much more memory and bigger heaps in proportion to the amount of memory you actually need in the program at any given time, and having larger heaps reduces fragmentation (or at least reduces the consequences of it).
Copying garbage collectors literally stop fragmentation. Reachable
objects are identified and moved to a memory partition where they
are now adjacent. The vacated memory partition is then efficiently used
to bump-allocate new objects.
--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 24 * Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"23David Brown
7 Mar 24 +* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"15Michael S
7 Mar 24 i`* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"14David Brown
7 Mar 24 i +- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Kaz Kylheku
8 Mar 24 i `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"12Paavo Helde
8 Mar 24 i  +* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"3David Brown
8 Mar 24 i  i`* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2bart
8 Mar 24 i  i `- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1David Brown
29 Apr 24 i  `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Apr 24 i   +* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"5Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i   i`* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"4Kaz Kylheku
29 Apr 24 i   i `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"3Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i   i  `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2Kaz Kylheku
29 Apr 24 i   i   `- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Apr 24 i   `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2paavo512
29 Apr 24 i    `- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 24 `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"7Kaz Kylheku
8 Mar 24  `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"6David Brown
8 Mar 24   `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"5Michael S
8 Mar 24    `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"4David Brown
8 Mar 24     +- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1Michael S
29 Apr 24     `* Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Apr 24      `- Re: "White House to Developers: Using C or C++ Invites Cybersecurity Risks"1aph

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal