Re: "undefined behavior"?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: "undefined behavior"?
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 13. Jun 2024, 00:18:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <877cet7qkl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]
I recommend never using "char" as a type unless you really mean a
character, limited to 7-bit ASCII.  So if your "outliers" array really
is an array of such characters, "char" is fine.  If it is intended to
be numbers and for some reason you specifically want 8-bit values, use
"uint8_t" or "int8_t", and initialise with { 0 }.
[...]

The implementation-definedness of plain char is awkward, but char
arrays generally work just fine for UTF-8 strings.  If char is
signed, byte values greater than 127 will be stored as negative
values, but it will almost certainly just work (if your system
is configured to handle UTF-8).  Likewise for Latin-1 and similar
8-bit character sets.

The standard string functions operate on arrays of plain char, so
storing UTF-8 strings in arrays of uint8_t or unsigned char will
seriously restrict what you can do with them.

(I'd like to a future standard require plain char to be unsigned,
but I don't know how likely that is.)

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jun 24 * "undefined behavior"?77DFS
12 Jun 24 +* Re: "undefined behavior"?39Barry Schwarz
12 Jun 24 i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?38DFS
13 Jun 24 i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?37Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 i  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?36DFS
13 Jun 24 i   `* Re: "undefined behavior"?35Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 i    `* Re: "undefined behavior"?34Malcolm McLean
13 Jun 24 i     +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Ben Bacarisse
13 Jun 24 i     +* Re: "undefined behavior"?29bart
13 Jun 24 i     i+* Re: "undefined behavior"?22Malcolm McLean
13 Jun 24 i     ii+* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Chris M. Thomasson
14 Jun 24 i     iii`- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii`* Re: "undefined behavior"?19Ben Bacarisse
14 Jun 24 i     ii `* Re: "undefined behavior"?18Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?17Ben Bacarisse
14 Jun 24 i     ii   +* Re: "undefined behavior"?13Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii   i+* Re: "undefined behavior"?4Richard Harnden
14 Jun 24 i     ii   ii`* Re: "undefined behavior"?3Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii   ii `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2bart
14 Jun 24 i     ii   ii  `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii   i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?8Ben Bacarisse
15 Jun 24 i     ii   i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?7Malcolm McLean
15 Jun 24 i     ii   i  +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Ben Bacarisse
15 Jun 24 i     ii   i  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?5David Brown
15 Jun 24 i     ii   i   `* Re: "undefined behavior"?4Richard Harnden
16 Jun 24 i     ii   i    +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Ben Bacarisse
16 Jun 24 i     ii   i    `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2David Brown
16 Jun 24 i     ii   i     `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i     ii   `* Re: "undefined behavior"?3Chris M. Thomasson
14 Jun 24 i     ii    `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Ben Bacarisse
15 Jun 24 i     ii     `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Chris M. Thomasson
14 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?6Keith Thompson
14 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1bart
14 Jun 24 i     i +* Re: "undefined behavior"?3David Brown
14 Jun 24 i     i i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 i     i i `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1David Brown
14 Jun 24 i     i `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 i     `* Re: "undefined behavior"?3Keith Thompson
14 Jun 24 i      `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Malcolm McLean
14 Jun 24 i       `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Keith Thompson
12 Jun 24 +* Re: "undefined behavior"?15David Brown
13 Jun 24 i+* Re: "undefined behavior"?6Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 ii+* Re: "undefined behavior"?2David Brown
14 Jun 24 iii`- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 ii`* Re: "undefined behavior"?3Tim Rentsch
19 Jun 24 ii `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Keith Thompson
22 Jun 24 ii  `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Tim Rentsch
13 Jun 24 i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?8DFS
13 Jun 24 i +* Re: "undefined behavior"?4Ike Naar
13 Jun 24 i i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?3DFS
13 Jun 24 i i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Lew Pitcher
13 Jun 24 i i  `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1DFS
13 Jun 24 i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?3David Brown
14 Jun 24 i  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Keith Thompson
14 Jun 24 i   `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1David Brown
12 Jun 24 +* Re: "undefined behavior"?19Janis Papanagnou
13 Jun 24 i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?18Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 i +* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Janis Papanagnou
13 Jun 24 i i`- Re: "undefined behavior"?1David Brown
13 Jun 24 i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?15David Brown
13 Jun 24 i  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?14DFS
14 Jun 24 i   `* Re: "undefined behavior"?13David Brown
15 Jun 24 i    +* Re: "undefined behavior"?11DFS
15 Jun 24 i    i`* Re: "undefined behavior"?10Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 i    i `* Re: "undefined behavior"?9DFS
15 Jun 24 i    i  `* Re: "undefined behavior"?8Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 i    i   `* Re: "undefined behavior"?7DFS
15 Jun 24 i    i    +* Re: "undefined behavior"?2Janis Papanagnou
15 Jun 24 i    i    i`- Re: "undefined behavior"?1DFS
15 Jun 24 i    i    +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1James Kuyper
15 Jun 24 i    i    +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 i    i    +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1bart
15 Jun 24 i    i    `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1David Brown
15 Jun 24 i    `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1David Brown
12 Jun 24 +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Keith Thompson
13 Jun 24 +- Re: "undefined behavior"?1bart
13 Jun 24 `- Re: "undefined behavior"?1Bonita Montero

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal