Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?

On 5/20/2024 6:21 PM, Sam wrote:

olcott writes:
 

On 5/20/2024 5:59 PM, Sam wrote:

>
Big deal. You were hoping to impress someone? I've got about a decade on you, and I wrote my own K&R C compiler, long before Y2K. I don't brag about it. Sit down, kid.
>

>
People were acting like I was totally clueless.

 Well, there's a name for this phenomenon. It's called "No shit, Sherlock?".

People on comp.theory have consistently lied about this
for at least the last two years:
typedef int (*ptr)();
int H(ptr P, ptr I);
int D(ptr x)
{
   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
int main()
{
   H(D,D);
   return 0;
}
This has preventing me from getting to he next step of
my proof that depends on accepting this.

 

Of course. A copyright statement. How impressive.
>
Your delusions of self-grandeur are only your delusions, not shared by anyone else.
>

>
I am only asking about the behavior of a single
C function template.

 Well, I don't know how to break the news to you, buddy. You better be prepared to continue asking, for the foreseeable future. Mastering the art of copy/paste is highly recommended.
 

I worked for the Air Force on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPOESS
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer