Re: Against bool

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: Against bool
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 31. May 2024, 05:22:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3bfq8$22mlu$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Thu, 30 May 2024 17:16:40 +0100, Malcolm McLean wrote:

And so we want to abolish bool and replace it with a bool enum.

    bool is_array(XMLNODE * node, bool useattributes);
    bool is_object(XMLNODE * node, bool useattributes);
    bool is_field(XMLNODE * node, bool useattributes);

Seems to me, the use of “bool” helps make pretty clear what those
arguments are for. What’s wrong with that?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 May 24 * Against bool7Malcolm McLean
31 May 24 +* Re: Against bool3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 May 24 i`* Re: Against bool2Malcolm McLean
31 May 24 i `- Re: Against bool1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
31 May 24 +- Re: Against bool1Blue-Maned_Hawk
31 May 24 +- Re: Against bool1David Brown
31 May 24 `- Re: Against bool1Thiago Adams

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal