Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++
Date : 22. Jun 2024, 18:36:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v56uij$3rako$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/22/2024 8:58 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/22/24 8:42 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/22/2024 5:13 AM, Richard Harnden wrote:
On 21/06/2024 22:41, olcott wrote:
On 6/17/2024 9:11 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 17.06.2024 um 05:47 schrieb olcott:
To understand this analysis requires a sufficient knowledge of
the C programming language and what an x86 emulator does.
>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int H0(ptr P);
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
   Infinite_Recursion();
}
>
void DDD()
{
   H0(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int main()
{
   H0(Infinite_Loop);
   H0(Infinite_Recursion);
   H0(DDD);
}
>
Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that when H0
emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, Infinite_Recursion, and
DDD that it must abort these emulations so that itself can terminate
normally.
>
When this is construed as non-halting criteria then simulating
termination analyzer H0 is correct to reject these inputs as non-
halting.
>
*My POD24 diagnosis is reducing the time I have left to work on this*
Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor
survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34614146/
>
>
Everything correct, no further questions allowed.
>
>
Thanks for your help on this. The Liars on comp.theory are
even lying about what you actually said.
>
>
Pretty sure that Bonita was taking the piss.
>
I would say that this would indicate that you are insufficiently
competent with the C programming language.
>
 It seems you are the one that doesn't know the C programing language. After all, you didn't know about the unordering of sub-expressions, or that this can lead to undefined behavior.
It seems pretty stupid to allow gaps in the semantics of C++ programs. Simply specify that the order of evaluation is left to right unless:
(a) Otherwise specified such as operator precedence rules.
(b) Derives the same result as left to right ordering.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jun 24 * Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?25olcott
17 Jun 24 +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?23Bonita Montero
17 Jun 24 i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott
19 Jun 24 i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott
21 Jun 24 i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?20olcott
22 Jun 24 i +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?18Richard Harnden
22 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?17olcott
22 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?16Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i  `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?15olcott
22 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?6Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?5Bonita Montero
22 Jun 24 i i   i `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?4Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i i   i  `* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?3Bonita Montero
23 Jun 24 i i   i   +- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Richard Damon
23 Jun 24 i i   i   `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
22 Jun 24 i i   +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?7Bonita Montero
22 Jun 24 i i   i`* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?6Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i +* Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?3Richard Damon
22 Jun 24 i i   i i+- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i i`- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jun 24 i i   i +- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1James Kuyper
23 Jun 24 i i   i `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
23 Jun 24 i i   `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1David Brown
26 Jun 24 i `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1Bonita Montero
23 Jun 24 `- Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is correct?1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal