Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?
De : bc (at) *nospam* freeuk.com (bart)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 10. Jul 2024, 18:30:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6mggd$20g3f$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/07/2024 16:48, Tim Rentsch wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
 
I earlier asked this:
>
"So if arrays aren't passed by value in C, and they aren't passed
by reference, then how the hell ARE they passed?!"
 They aren't.  C allows lots of things to be passed as an argument
to a function:  several varieties of numeric values, structs,
unions, and pointers, including both pointers to object types and
pointers to function types.  C does not have a way for a function
to take an argument that is either an array or a function.  There
is a way to take pointers to those things, but not the things
themselves.  Arrays and functions are second-class values in C.
That's a good point. It's not just arrays that can't be passed by value (because the language says so) but also functions (because its not meaningful).
Yet, although pointers to arrays and function can be passed (without even doing anything special like using &), you are not allowed to say that anything is passed by reference in C!
The automatic conversion to a pointer, which is also a feature of true pass-by-reference, doesn't count.
Not needing an explicit deref inside the callee (another characteristic of pass-by-reference) doesn't count either.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Jul 24 * Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?305BGB
5 Jul 24 +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jul 24 i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1yeti
5 Jul 24 +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?275Keith Thompson
5 Jul 24 i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jul 25 i`- 
5 Jul 24 +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?26bart
5 Jul 24 i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1BGB
6 Jul 24 i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul 24 i +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?17Keith Thompson
6 Jul 24 i i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
6 Jul 24 i i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul 24 i i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Ben Bacarisse
6 Jul 24 i i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
7 Jul 24 i i +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?10James Kuyper
10 Jul 24 i i i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul 24 i i i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?8James Kuyper
11 Jul 24 i i i  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Jul 24 i i i   +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2David Brown
11 Jul 24 i i i   i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Malcolm McLean
11 Jul 24 i i i   +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3bart
11 Jul 24 i i i   i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Chris M. Thomasson
12 Jul 24 i i i   i `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jul 24 i i i   `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1James Kuyper
7 Jul 24 i i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
25 Aug 24 i i `- Re: technology discussion ? does the world need a "new" C ?1dave thompson 2
6 Jul 24 i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
6 Jul 24 i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1James Kuyper
6 Jul 24 i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?4bart
7 Jul 24 i  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3Keith Thompson
7 Jul 24 i   `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2bart
7 Jul 24 i    `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
5 Jul 24 `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1lexi hale

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal