Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?

Sujet : Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 12. Jul 2024, 12:44:21

Autres entêtes

Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6r4um$30q95$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

On 11.07.2024 22:37, bart wrote:

On 11/07/2024 21:29, Keith Thompson wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
This my first comment on the subject:
>
"Arrays are passed by reference:
...
Although ..."
>
And that statement was incorrect, even with the "Although".

So arrays are passed by value? Gotcha.

Neither is true. - Tertium datur!

"Array passing" is in "C" realized using a pointer passing
mechanism where the pointer is passed "by value".

Neither an array is passed [by value] nor there's a "call
by reference" mechanism in "C".

This has been explained (also with references to original
sources) to you many times.

Janis

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	305	BGB
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	2	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	yeti
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	275	Keith Thompson
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Jul 25	…
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	26	bart
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	BGB
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	24	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	17	Keith Thompson
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Janis Papanagnou
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	15	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Ben Bacarisse
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Keith Thompson
7 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	10	James Kuyper
10 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	9	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	8	James Kuyper
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	7	Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	2	David Brown
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Malcolm McLean
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	3	bart
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	2	Chris M. Thomasson
12 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Chris M. Thomasson
11 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	James Kuyper
7 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Tim Rentsch
25 Aug 24	Re: technology discussion ? does the world need a "new" C ?	1	dave thompson 2
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Janis Papanagnou
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	James Kuyper
6 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	4	bart
7 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	3	Keith Thompson
7 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	2	bart
7 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	Keith Thompson
5 Jul 24	Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?	1	lexi hale

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal