Liste des Groupes | Revenir à l c |
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:But your typical anti-Microsoft remarks are fine? Since you called it a 'mistake' to keep 'long' the same between 32/64-bit machines, even though both OSes kept 'int' the same.On 20/03/2025 13:36, Scott Lurndal wrote:then it's surprisingly rare in source code.That's what I said. Thanks for the confirmation. It doesn't change>>
Long is useless, because Microsoft made the mistake of defining
'long' as 32-bits on 64-bit architectures, while unix and linux
define it as 64-bits.
Unix and Linux define it as 32 bits on 32-bit architectures and 64 bits
on 64-bit ones.
the fact that Microsoft didn't define long as 64-bit on 64-bit architectures,
creating incompatibilities that didn't exist in the 32-bit world
between the two dominant operating systems.
Remainder of bart's typical windows-centric complaints elided.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.