Sujet : Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 20. Apr 2025, 03:43:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vu1n0f$2sch1$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/19/2025 12:36 PM, bart wrote:
On 19/04/2025 20:15, James Kuyper wrote:
On 19.04.2025 00:27, bart wrote:
On 18/04/2025 19:10, James Kuyper wrote:
...
If all you can do is "hope for the best", you're doing it wrong. It's
your job to ensure that they are not arbitrary unrelated expressions,
but correctly related expressions, and that's no different from your
responsibility for all of the other expressions that make up your
program.
...
If you find that problematic, you shouldn't be programming in
any language, but certainly not in C.
>
I see it didn't take you long to get to the personal insult. What is it
with this group?
>
You are constantly complaining about how difficult you find it to be to
deal with various features of C that most C programmers have little or
no trouble dealing with.
How could I possibly justify concluding that
the problem lies anywhere other than in your own abilities?
Did I say I find it difficult? I said the feature was: Poor, Crude, Primitive, Error prone, Hard to grok, a PITA to write, among other things.
Ouch! Chalk one up to Murphy's law, shit happens and when it occurs the toast always lands jelly side down. Well, shit. Also a smith and wesson always beats four aces. Debug some crazy race infested mutex shit, well, you might start to think, whats the point! argh. lol. A person says a broadcast us better than a single signal, well,,, drink up!
[...]
do { quit; } else { }
Re: do { quit; } else { }