Re: remark on defining size of basic types

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: remark on defining size of basic types
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 04. Apr 2024, 02:15:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uukrfp$7l0f$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 01:34:48 +0200, fir wrote:

here is a problem in using 64 big ints on windows ...

    #include <stdint.h>

    int64_t signed_64bit_int;
    uint64_t unsigned_64bit_int;



Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Apr 24 * remark on defining size of basic types21fir
4 Apr 24 `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24  `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types19fir
4 Apr 24   `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Apr 24    `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types17fir
4 Apr 24     `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types16Janis Papanagnou
4 Apr 24      +* Re: remark on defining size of basic types7James Kuyper
4 Apr 24      i`* Re: remark on defining size of basic types6Michael S
4 Apr 24      i +- Re: remark on defining size of basic types1Keith Thompson
5 Apr 24      i +* Re: remark on defining size of basic types2Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 24      i i`- Re: remark on defining size of basic types1James Kuyper
5 Apr 24      i `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types2James Kuyper
5 Apr 24      i  `- Re: remark on defining size of basic types1Keith Thompson
5 Apr 24      `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Apr 24       +* Re: remark on defining size of basic types6Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 24       i`* Re: remark on defining size of basic types5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Apr 24       i `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types4Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 24       i  `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Apr 24       i   `* Re: remark on defining size of basic types2Michael S
5 Apr 24       i    `- Re: remark on defining size of basic types1Keith Thompson
5 Apr 24       `- Re: remark on defining size of basic types1Kenny McCormack

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal