Re: Heh heh... (Was: Recursion, Yo)

In article <20240411081303.407@kylheku.com>,
Kaz Kylheku  <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> wrote:

On 2024-04-11, Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:

In article <20240410174139.914@kylheku.com>,
Kaz Kylheku  <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> wrote:
...

(Apologies to Kenny for the "ibid.")

>
Heh heh.  Got that one.  Had to think for a minute or so, though.
>
Anyway, just for the record, I was specifically talking about things like
"ad hominem" - i.e., all those terms for supposedly bad arguments.  Like
"ad populem" (Or however you spell it...) and so on.
>
Basically, I am saying that when someone uses the term "ad hominem", they
are conceding that they have lost the argument.

>
Wait, isn't that "ad hit"? (adolf hitlerum)

I don't know what that means.

    (T. Brennan - Yes, I've started watching "Bones" again...)

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long.  As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs.  In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/Noam