Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance
De : eesnimi (at) *nospam* osa.pri.ee (Paavo Helde)
Groupes : comp.lang.c comp.lang.c++
Date : 23. May 2024, 08:23:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2mndf$1kk52$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 23.05.2024 02:44, olcott wrote:
Does enables conformance mean: Flags non conformance?
No. Enabling conformance means enabling support for the conforming features.
Flagging non-conformance is not possible in general as there are more creative fools out there than there are compiler writers.
There are zillions of ways to write non-conforming code, for example an endless loop is not conforming in C++. The compiler is not obliged to diagnose it, but it is allowed for the compiler to silently optimize the non-conforming code away, assuming it is never called. At least that's what g++ folks think.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * Compile time checking of standards conformance11olcott
23 May 24 `* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance10Paavo Helde
23 May 24  +- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1olcott
23 May 24  +* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance4olcott
23 May 24  i`* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance3David Brown
23 May 24  i `* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance2olcott
23 May 24  i  `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1David Brown
23 May 24  +* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance3James Kuyper
24 May 24  i`* Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance2Paavo Helde
24 May 24  i `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1James Kuyper
24 May 24  `- Re: Compile time checking of standards conformance1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal