Sujet : Re: question about nullptr
De : ben (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 15. Jul 2024, 00:00:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87y163inp9.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+
ng@hotmail.com> writes:
On 13.07.2024 01:59, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
On 11.07.2024 01:25, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
[...]
Without such an example, your argument seems to be overly generic.
>
That's why I had problems to "explain" the reasons to you; because
it's so universal a property, so obvious (as I said), that I don't
know what else I could say.
Yes, that's been the clear for a while now. That's why, when you said
you could not say more, I was happy to leave it at that (my "ok").
>
You again strip the post where my try for an explanation follows:
Of course; I have nothing to say about your explanation. I understood
it from the very first time you posted it (although I suppose I might be
mistaken about that). Nothing about it is in dispute. Should I have
kept it and ignored it?
What example could I give that explains that if you're looking for
specific dedicated semantical values it's easier to look them up
by [semantical] name than by a [ambiguous] number.
>
Are those semantical names so meaningless to you?
No, I get it.
Let's take the 'bool' sample; do you find it more helpful to look
for numerical falues in the code than to look for standard literals
like 'true' and 'false'? (It's not much different concerning 'NULL'.)
I have no recollection of an occasion when searching for true or false
has ever helped me to find a bug. If you do, please recount the story.
That's the sort of thing that has been missing (for me).
(But okay, given your last response patterns you seem to not be
interested.)
I have always been interested in hearing more about your experiences
about what you called "bug-tracking". That's why I asked "can you say
more?". And when you said "no" I thought that would be the end of it.
(By the way, I still don't know what you mean by bug-tracking. I've
assumed you mean tracking as in tracking down, i.e. finding and fixing
bugs rather than the more usual meaning of logging and recording details
of known bugs.)
-- Ben.