Sujet : Re: "Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" - YouTube
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 03. Aug 2024, 01:59:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8jrsn$32llf$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; )
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 14:59:01 -0400, James Kuyper wrote:
On 7/31/24 08:13, jseigh wrote:
>
... and if they are using
reference counting to manage memory it's going to perform very badly
compared to Java GC.
Keep in mind that this is not an "unsupported claim" - it's the result
of measurements ...
Yeah, I wonder why Java fan(atic)s keep spouting that nonsense. Other
languages (Perl, Python) have shown the benefits of having reference
counting as a first resort, only falling back to garbage collection to
handle those (less frequent) cases where it is needed.
Re: "Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" - YouTube
Re: "Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" - YouTube