Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 05. Aug 2024, 00:33:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8ovkm$8t63$8@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; )
On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 14:05:00 -0000 (UTC), Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:

Macros can get into the realm
of unreadability, but there's an unfortunate feedback loop here:  people
are told to not use macros because they're unreadable, which means that
people don't get as much experience with macros, which means that they
find it hard to read macros ...

Macros done by manipulating strings in a preprocessor are the wrong way to
do them.

The right way to do macros is at the AST level, like Lisp does them.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Aug 24 * is STC a good supplementary library for C?13Mark Summerfield
3 Aug 24 +* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?9Stefan Ram
3 Aug 24 i+* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?3Stefan Ram
3 Aug 24 ii`* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?2Bart
4 Aug 24 ii `- Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Aug 24 i`* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?5Blue-Maned_Hawk
5 Aug 24 i `* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Aug 24 i  `* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?3Blue-Maned_Hawk
6 Aug 24 i   `* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Aug 24 i    `- Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?1Blue-Maned_Hawk
3 Aug 24 `* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?3Richard Harnden
4 Aug 24  `* Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?2Mark Summerfield
4 Aug 24   `- Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?1James Kuyper

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal