Sujet : Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?
De : bluemanedhawk (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Blue-Maned_Hawk)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 06. Aug 2024, 02:54:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <pan$44063$4834e1c7$8596435$90d08f31@invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 16:35:52 -0000 (UTC), Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Macros done by manipulating strings in a preprocessor are the wrong
way to do them.
The right way to do macros is at the AST level, like Lisp does them.
Standard C preprocessors are already token-based instead of text-based
like prestandard ones were.
Not what I said.
Then what did you say and why isn't my reply relevant to it?
-- Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/blu.mɛin.dʰak/│he/him/his/himself/Mr.blue-maned_hawk.srht.siteThe exact weight of the twenty-pound note is a state secret for some reason.
is STC a good supplementary library for C?
Re: is STC a good supplementary library for C?