Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere

Thiago Adams wrote:

<snip/>
 
Sometimes, too much syntactic sugar is not good because it creates too
many variants.

I agree with this.  One exemplar of such a claim that comes first to my
mind is Perl:  postfix statements, optional syntax, ambiguous precedence,
and exceptions to all rules, it's got all the shit.  (Though it does
strictly mandate braces in compound statements, which i quite like.)



--
Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/blu.mɛin.dʰak/│he/him/his/himself/Mr.
blue-maned_hawk.srht.site
(as new—only one hundred year's use)