Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 28. Aug 2024, 19:39:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vannc6$3iao5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28/08/2024 18:31, Tim Rentsch wrote:
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
 
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
>
Not exactly.  There are things that can be done inside a
statement-expression that are not available inside nested
functions or lambdas.
>
And you're not going to tell us what those things are.
 Let me add something to my last response.  I think you're doing
a disservice to the community by always explaining everything
in great detail.  Sometimes, sure;  perhaps even mostly.  But
not always.  People need to learn to think.  You must have heard
the proverb about giving a man a fish versus teaching a man to
fish.  You just keep doling out fish.  I want people to learn to
think so they can fish for themselves.
 
As someone who has learned a lot over the years from people in this group, I think /you/ are doing the disservice with your patronising attitude and your treatment of everyone else as though they were your first-year students trying to cheat on their homework.  And it is made hugely worse by your habit of posting a teaser then disappearing for a month or more before dragging up old threads that everyone else has put aside.
Remember, this is comp.lang.c - it is /not/ help.me.learn.to.learn.
Keith answers people's questions, and gives constructive help.  When people want to learn more and think deeper, he is happy to encourage that - questioning their assumptions or giving more information.  But I don't think Keith needs me defending him here - his reputation in this group is outstanding with pretty much every regular.
You are possibly the regular in this group with the most technical knowledge of C, its standards and its history.  But in term of helping people, you are frustratingly poor.  If your aim is to encourage people to think and learn for themselves, you are regularly a failure.  If your aim is to make people think you are a self-righteous prick, you have done a much better job.

One difference between you and me is that I almost never respond
to a posting of yours that is part of a conversation with someone
else to complain about your answer.  And I don't engage in such
behavior even though I think that what you're doing is worse than
what I'm doing.  I'm fed up with your high and mighty attitude.
 
The irony of that last sentence is incredible.  With your negligible level of self-awareness, you should give up programming and enter politics.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Aug 24 * on allowing "int a" definition everywhere62fir
20 Aug 24 +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere24Thiago Adams
20 Aug 24 i+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4fir
20 Aug 24 ii+- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
20 Aug 24 ii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Thiago Adams
20 Aug 24 ii `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
21 Aug 24 i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere19Blue-Maned_Hawk
21 Aug 24 i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere18Thiago Adams
21 Aug 24 i  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Bart
21 Aug 24 i  i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Thiago Adams
21 Aug 24 i  i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Michael S
21 Aug 24 i  i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Thiago Adams
22 Aug 24 i  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere13Blue-Maned_Hawk
22 Aug 24 i   +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere5Keith Thompson
22 Aug 24 i   i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Ben Bacarisse
22 Aug 24 i   i +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson
22 Aug 24 i   i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Kaz Kylheku
23 Aug 24 i   i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Ben Bacarisse
22 Aug 24 i   `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere7Bart
22 Aug 24 i    +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Thiago Adams
22 Aug 24 i    i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Blue-Maned_Hawk
23 Aug 24 i    `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4fir
23 Aug 24 i     `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Bart
23 Aug 24 i      `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
23 Aug 24 i       `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
21 Aug 24 `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere37Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Aug 24  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Ben Bacarisse
21 Aug 24  i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Ben Bacarisse
25 Aug 24  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere34fir
27 Aug 24   `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24    +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere21fir
27 Aug 24    i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere20fir
27 Aug 24    i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere19fir
27 Aug 24    i  +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
27 Aug 24    i  i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
27 Aug 24    i  i `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
27 Aug 24    i  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere15fir
27 Aug 24    i   +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere13fir
27 Aug 24    i   i+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere9Bart
27 Aug 24    i   ii+* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
27 Aug 24    i   iii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
27 Aug 24    i   iii `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
2 Sep 24    i   ii`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Sep 24    i   ii `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Bart
3 Sep 24    i   ii  `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Sep 24    i   ii   +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Kaz Kylheku
3 Sep 24    i   ii   `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Michael S
27 Aug 24    i   i`* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere3fir
29 Aug 24    i   i `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2fir
29 Aug 24    i   i  `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1fir
3 Sep 24    i   `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Aug 24    `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere11Blue-Maned_Hawk
28 Aug 24     `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere10Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24      `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere9Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24       +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Ben Bacarisse
28 Aug 24       i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24       +* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere2Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24       i`- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24       `* Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere4Tim Rentsch
28 Aug 24        +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1David Brown
28 Aug 24        +- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1James Kuyper
28 Aug 24        `- Re: on allowing "int a" definition everywhere1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal