Sujet : Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 29. Aug 2024, 01:11:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vaoarm$3l470$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 01:58:26 +0200, fir wrote:
a⌐b
What you have there is U+2310 REVERSED NOT SIGN.
For comparison, “¬” is U+00AC NOT SIGN. It denotes logical negation. It
would be a natural replacement for the “!” prefix monadic operator.
In fact, it had that meaning in PL/I, back in the day. Interesting that
EBCDIC thought to make a place in its repertoire for “¬”, but ASCII did
not.
about some potentially interesting unicode operators
Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators
