Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 17. Sep 2024, 20:52:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86jzfa9hxn.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:

On 17.09.2024 15:15, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
>
[excerpted for brevity]
>
In the domain of German speaking countries - isn't Tim located there?
(I somehow got the impression) - we've heard about "Parameterubergabe";
[..] means passing, transferring, handing over, transmitting, etc.
>
Because of that - and because I could not follow the thoughts of Tim's
last paragraph with his conclusion;  I didn't find it convincing - I'd
think that "passing" would fit better, also in the light of historic
usage [hereabouts], even though I've often heared (and also used) the
phrase "call by" in the English CS domain in the past (and probably
still used to it).
>
If you have something to say to me please respond to my posting
directly.
>
I respond at the place that appears most appropriate for what
I want to say in the context I want to reply to.  I'm not here
to serve your, umm, "standards" (to avoid the word "idee fixe");
and you just have to accept that[*], I fear.
>
I'm sure others here have no problem to go upward the thread
hierarchy one more level to find your text that I deliberately
didn't quote for the reason (still quoted above) I mentioned;
I don't think they're worth quoting, they provide no argument,
they were fuzzy.  (Of course all only IMO.)

My statement was meant as a request, not a demand.  I asked
because I wasn't sure if you had something in particular to
say to me or if you were just talking more or less aimlessly.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jul 24 * Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?213David Brown
9 Jul 24 +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?205bart
9 Jul 24 i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?202Ben Bacarisse
9 Jul 24 ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?201bart
9 Jul 24 ii +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?192Ben Bacarisse
9 Jul 24 ii i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3BGB
10 Jul 24 ii ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Ben Bacarisse
10 Jul 24 ii ii `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1BGB
9 Jul 24 ii i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?188bart
9 Jul 24 ii i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
10 Jul 24 ii i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?186Ben Bacarisse
10 Jul 24 ii i  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?185bart
10 Jul 24 ii i   `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?184Ben Bacarisse
10 Jul 24 ii i    +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Thiago Adams
10 Jul 24 ii i    +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?175bart
10 Jul 24 ii i    i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
10 Jul 24 ii i    i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?54Tim Rentsch
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?14Michael S
10 Jul 24 ii i    iii+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?8David Brown
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?7Michael S
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?6Kaz Kylheku
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?5Michael S
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii   +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Kaz Kylheku
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii   +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii   +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1David Brown
11 Jul 24 ii i    iiii   `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Ben Bacarisse
10 Jul 24 ii i    iii+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Kaz Kylheku
11 Jul 24 ii i    iii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?4Tim Rentsch
11 Jul 24 ii i    iii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3BGB
11 Jul 24 ii i    iii  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Tim Rentsch
11 Jul 24 ii i    iii   `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1BGB
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?39bart
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?37Michael S
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?34bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Michael S
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?32Tim Rentsch
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?31bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii  +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Tim Rentsch
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii  i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?28Keith Thompson
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii   `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?27bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?25Keith Thompson
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?15bart
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?14David Brown
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?12bart
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?7David Brown
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?6bart
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2bart
13 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1David Brown
13 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3David Brown
17 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Bart
17 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii ii   `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1David Brown
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3Keith Thompson
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2James Kuyper
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii i  `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1bart
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    ii `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1BGB
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?9bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1David Brown
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?6Janis Papanagnou
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?5bart
13 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i   +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3Janis Papanagnou
13 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i   i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Keith Thompson
13 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i   i `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
14 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    i   `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
12 Jul 24 ii i    ii ii    `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Thiago Adams
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1James Kuyper
11 Jul 24 ii i    ii `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
10 Jul 24 ii i    i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2James Kuyper
10 Jul 24 ii i    ii`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?117Ben Bacarisse
11 Jul 24 ii i    i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?116bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Ben Bacarisse
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?112Michael S
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?111bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Michael S
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?109David Brown
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?108bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i   `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?107David Brown
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i    `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?106bart
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?103David Brown
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?102Janis Papanagnou
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?29bart
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?23Kaz Kylheku
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?22Keith Thompson
25 Aug 24 ii i    i  i     i ii +- Re: technology discussion ? does the world need a "new" C ?1dave thompson 2
2 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?20Tim Rentsch
2 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii  `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?19Keith Thompson
2 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii   `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?18Ben Bacarisse
2 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii    +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Keith Thompson
8 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii    i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
16 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii    `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?15Tim Rentsch
16 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?13Keith Thompson
16 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     i+* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?4Janis Papanagnou
17 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     ii`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?3Tim Rentsch
17 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     ii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Janis Papanagnou
17 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     ii  `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
26 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?8Tim Rentsch
16 Sep 24 ii i    i  i     i ii     `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Ben Bacarisse
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Janis Papanagnou
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i i`* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?4Keith Thompson
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i +* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?2Kaz Kylheku
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     i `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?70Michael S
12 Jul 24 ii i    i  i     `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1James Kuyper
11 Jul 24 ii i    i  `- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Tim Rentsch
10 Jul 24 ii i    `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?7Janis Papanagnou
9 Jul 24 ii `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?8Kaz Kylheku
9 Jul 24 i+- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1David Brown
9 Jul 24 i`- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Keith Thompson
9 Jul 24 +- Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?1Michael S
9 Jul 24 `* Re: technology discussion → does the world need a "new" C ?6BGB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal