Re: Python recompile

On 14/03/2025 19:37, Richard Harnden wrote:

On 14/03/2025 19:04, bart wrote:

After all no one (according to you) was complaining about grappling with 100 discrete files.

 100 discrete files helps 100 developers not to step on each other's toes.
 And most of those 100 .o's won't need to be recompiled on every make.
It's quicker and easier.
 

That may be true about the people who /develop/ this sqlite3 product.
But this is a file created to ease deployment by people who want to /use/ it.
I don't know why nobody in this group can grasp that concept even though I've explained it a hundred times. For example, I have a transpiler product that turns a 50-module project in my language into a single, easy-to-build C source file.
But everyone makes the same point about it being hard to manage. No one is even going to look inside it!