Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 05. May 2025, 11:30:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vva3vc$96h2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 03.05.2025 07:11, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
 
Expanding on this point, C++ goes to town with pass-by-value interfaces
involving objects. For instance the std::basic_string template allows
C++ programs to treat dynamic strings as just values to be tossed
around:
 
   std::string path_combine(std::string dir, std::string name)
   {
      return dir + "/" + name;
   }

Hmm.. - my C++ days were long ago but I seem to recall that the
suggestion for passing non-trivial objects by-value was that they
should instead be passed by 'const &' (as a "quasi-by-value") for
performance reasons.

C++ experience informs us that you can get away with doing this
with PODs (plain old datatypes---structs with no constructors
or destructors) only to a point. But in C, that's all you have.
 
[...]

Janis


Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Regarding assignment to struct84Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Barry Schwarz
2 May 25 i`* That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)12Kenny McCormack
3 May 25 i `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)11Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Janis Papanagnou
3 May 25 i  +* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)5Kaz Kylheku
3 May 25 i  i+* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)3Kaz Kylheku
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Janis Papanagnou
5 May 25 i  ii `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Kaz Kylheku
4 May 25 i  i`- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1James Kuyper
4 May 25 i  `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 i   `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Waldek Hebisch
3 May 25 i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct51Andrey Tarasevich
3 May 25 i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
4 May 25 ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7James Kuyper
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
4 May 25 ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1James Kuyper
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 ii   `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct40Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct39Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct16Michael S
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct14Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct11Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Michael S
6 May 25 i  ii  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Waldek Hebisch
6 May 25 i  ii    +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
7 May 25 i  ii    i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii    `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Andrey Tarasevich
8 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
8 May 25 i  i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct15Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
5 May 25 i  ii+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  iii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Kaz Kylheku
6 May 25 i  iii `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Nick Bowler
6 May 25 i  i   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
7 May 25 i  i    `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Nick Bowler
7 May 25 i  i     +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Keith Thompson
8 May 25 i  i     i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Nick Bowler
8 May 25 i  i     `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
12 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1NotAorB
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8David Brown
5 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Muttley
5 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
6 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Michael S
4 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Richard Damon
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Michael S
4 May 25 i +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Rosario19
4 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal