Re: do { quit; } else { }

On 09/05/2025 16:04, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 09.05.2025 um 17:01 schrieb Scott Lurndal:

Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes:

Am 06.04.2025 um 17:14 schrieb Tim Rentsch:
>

My impression was that "defer", or something very much like
it, is being considered for inclusion in a future C standard. ...

>
With C++ you can have defer without extending the language.

>
This, however is comp.lang.c.

 I'm just trying to make it clear that C lacks convenience
and  productivity on every level.

Then use something convenient and productive. But please confine your discussions of your chosen alternative to comp.lang.your.chosen.alternative instead of dragging them into comp.lang.c, where we discuss C.

C folks simply don't want
to abandon their minimalism paradigm, which continues to
make the language very difficult to use.

Then do by all means use something easier. But please confine your discussions of your chosen alternative to comp.lang.your.chosen.alternative instead of dragging them into comp.lang.c, where we discuss C.
You don't get to pick the group's topic any more than I do.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within