Re: encapsulating directory operations

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: encapsulating directory operations
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 27. May 2025, 15:23:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1014hsq$2lg4p$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 26/05/2025 07:19, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood wrote:
Groovy hepcat Tim Rentsch was jivin' in comp.lang.c on Fri, 23 May 2025
10:43 pm. It's a cool scene! Dig it.
 
C99 is just as stable as C90, and has been for well over a
decade.
    Methinks Tim is having trouble with his arithmetic. Either that or he
doesn't know what year it is now. :)
   C99 was ratified in 1999, over two and a half decades ago.
 
C11 is just as stable as C90, and has been for just slightly
less than a decade.
    And C11 was ratified in 2011, no? That was almost a decade and a half
ago.
 
Tim was, I believe, taking into account the time it took for common implementations of C compilers and libraries to have complete and generally bug-free support for the standards, and for these implementations to become common.  C99 was published in 1999, but it took quite a while before most people programming in C could happily use C99 without worrying about the tool support being "experimental" or not as mature as C90 support.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 * encapsulating directory operations170Paul Edwards
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations21Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations18Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i    +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
22 May07:49 i    i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May08:02 i    i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
22 May00:51 i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations13James Kuyper
22 May06:04 i     `* Re: encapsulating directory operations12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May19:13 i      `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11James Kuyper
22 May23:46 i       `* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May00:07 i        `* Re: encapsulating directory operations9James Kuyper
23 May00:15 i         `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Kaz Kylheku
23 May00:26 i          +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
23 May01:44 i          i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
24 May03:26 i          i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May01:10 i          `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
23 May03:08 i           `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Kaz Kylheku
24 May00:29 i            `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
24 May01:08 i             `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations64Keith Thompson
20 May 25 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May 25 ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 iii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
20 May 25 iii i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
23 May13:43 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Tim Rentsch
23 May14:27 ii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
24 May06:32 ii i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Tim Rentsch
24 May06:54 ii i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
26 May06:19 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood
27 May15:23 ii  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations4David Brown
27 May16:10 ii  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Michael S
27 May18:24 ii  i +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
28 May00:16 ii  i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch
28 May00:18 ii  `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations43Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations39David Brown
20 May 25 i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations38Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
21 May 25 i i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2David Brown
21 May 25 i i i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations27David Brown
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  ii +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  ii `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May 25 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i  i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i i  i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations5David Brown
21 May 25 i i  i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i    +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Michael S
22 May11:37 i i  i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
22 May18:53 i i  i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3David Brown
21 May 25 i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i    `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
21 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations79Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations78Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations77Keith Thompson
20 May 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations76Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i   ii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations61Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations53Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations52Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   ii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations46Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   ii i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations43Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   ii ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
22 May22:10 i   ii ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations38Paul Edwards
22 May23:06 i   ii ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
21 May20:31 i   ii i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
22 May22:52 i   ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations7James Kuyper
21 May22:19 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Waldek Hebisch
21 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Janis Papanagnou
22 May19:34 +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
25 May06:10 `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal