Sujet : Re: encapsulating directory operations
De : mutazilah (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul Edwards)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 30. May 2025, 09:41:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101bqvo$d9rp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message
news:10191uh$3olom$2@dont-email.me...On Wed, 21 May 2025 19:23:45 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message
news:100j8t8$2g75r$5@dont-email.me...
>
On Wed, 21 May 2025 07:41:12 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
Basically the software industry is a joke. The advances have all been
done by hardware engineers.
>
Didn't they use software to manage that?
>
Yes - as the guy (Jeff) said - software written by lunatics/artists.
>
Was RCU invented by the hardware guys, or the software guys?
>
What about journalling? Two-phase commit? Diffie-Hellman? RSA? Kerberos?
kexec?
I'm not disputing advances in computer science. Three way diff
would be my favorite.
It then needs to be incorporated into a professional product.
Which is properly funded, understood, someone has pride
in the integrity of the product, and bugs reports are always
addressed with professionalism - no matter what is required.
Literally to the ends of the earth. If they ever needed more
money to fix a bug, they'd just jack up the prices they charge.
In other words, MVS (z/OS).
I doubt that the original author (Jeff) was working on z/OS when
he wrote about the shambles he saw.
BFN. Paul.