Re: encapsulating directory operations

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l c 
Sujet : Re: encapsulating directory operations
De : mutazilah (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul Edwards)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 30. May 2025, 09:41:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101bqvo$d9rp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message
news:10191uh$3olom$2@dont-email.me...
On Wed, 21 May 2025 19:23:45 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message
news:100j8t8$2g75r$5@dont-email.me...
>
On Wed, 21 May 2025 07:41:12 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
Basically the software industry is a joke. The advances have all been
done by hardware engineers.
>
Didn't they use software to manage that?
>
Yes - as the guy (Jeff) said - software written by lunatics/artists.
>
Was RCU invented by the hardware guys, or the software guys?
>
What about journalling? Two-phase commit? Diffie-Hellman? RSA? Kerberos?
kexec?

I'm not disputing advances in computer science. Three way diff
would be my favorite.

It then needs to be incorporated into a professional product.
Which is properly funded, understood, someone has pride
in the integrity of the product, and bugs reports are always
addressed with professionalism - no matter what is required.
Literally to the ends of the earth. If they ever needed more
money to fix a bug, they'd just jack up the prices they charge.

In other words, MVS (z/OS).

I doubt that the original author (Jeff) was working on z/OS when
he wrote about the shambles he saw.

BFN. Paul.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 * encapsulating directory operations218Paul Edwards
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations22Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Paul Edwards
21 May 25 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations18Paul Edwards
21 May 25 ii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 ii   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
22 May 25 ii   i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25 ii   i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
22 May 25 ii   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations13James Kuyper
22 May 25 ii    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25 ii     `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11James Kuyper
22 May 25 ii      `* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 ii       `* Re: encapsulating directory operations9James Kuyper
23 May 25 ii        `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Kaz Kylheku
23 May 25 ii         +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
23 May 25 ii         i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
24 May 25 ii         i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 ii         `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
23 May 25 ii          `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Kaz Kylheku
24 May 25 ii           `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
24 May 25 ii            `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
31 May07:20 i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations71Keith Thompson
20 May 25 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations25Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May 25 ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 iii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
20 May 25 iii i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
23 May 25 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations15Tim Rentsch
23 May 25 ii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Richard Heathfield
24 May 25 ii i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Tim Rentsch
24 May 25 ii i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
28 May13:41 ii i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Tim Rentsch
28 May14:10 ii i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
26 May06:19 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood
27 May15:23 ii  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations7David Brown
27 May16:10 ii  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Michael S
27 May18:24 ii  i +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
28 May00:16 ii  i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Tim Rentsch
28 May14:04 ii  i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Michael S
28 May23:54 ii  i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
29 May09:21 ii  i    `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
28 May00:18 ii  `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations45Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations41David Brown
20 May 25 i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations40Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
21 May 25 i i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2David Brown
21 May 25 i i i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations29David Brown
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  ii +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  ii `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May 25 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i  i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i i  i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
29 May08:21 i i  i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 May09:41 i i  i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations5David Brown
21 May 25 i i  i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Richard Heathfield
21 May 25 i i  i    +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Michael S
22 May 25 i i  i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
22 May 25 i i  i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3David Brown
21 May 25 i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i i    `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
21 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations119Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations118Paul Edwards
20 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations117Keith Thompson
20 May 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations116Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Paul Edwards
21 May 25 i   i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 i   i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations101Keith Thompson
21 May 25 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations7James Kuyper
21 May 25 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Waldek Hebisch
21 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Janis Papanagnou
22 May 25 +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
25 May 25 `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal