Sujet : Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)
De : andrews (at) *nospam* sdf.org (Andrew Smallshaw)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 04. Jun 2025, 13:37:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <slrn1040ffu.gtc.andrews@sdf.org>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Patched for libcanlock3) (NetBSD)
On 2025-05-31, Richard Tobin <
richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
In article <101eqj0$13q67$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>
Probably not, as my C90/C99 test more or less illustrated. It
'knew' of a syntax rule, but failed to apply it correctly.
>
You have put your finger on it. LLMs do not apply knowledge.
It was also blissfully ignorant that C90 lacks // comments.
-- Andrew Smallshawandrews@sdf.org
Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me
Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)