Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:besides he is partally right - he has a bit rigid definitions who troll is - but this is kinda complex matter becouse depending on definitions i may be a troll according to one, he may be atroll according to anotherOn 09/09/2026 4:18 PM, fir wrote:keith probably used to call me a troll (oz i not stick to his own rigid rules)Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson pisze:Yeah, I don't worry about Keith and trolls like him, and discuss what IOn 08/09/2026 7:52 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:>Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> writes:>
[128 lines deleted]
>One of the things I avoid in C# is a nasty makefile, and generally>
having to tool around in Unix. That is all taken care of by the C#
compiler included in the suite I use to generate my programs.
OK, I think we've established that you like C# better than C
(or C++).
>
This is comp.lang.c. Complaints about C are topical here, even
though some of the ones that introduced this thread are silly.
But if you want to discuss C#, please do so elsewhere.
>
Oh, don't mind Keith. He likes to butt in on other people's discussions
and behave like he's some owner of comp.lang.c. He's not. There isn't
even a comp.lang.csharp group to direct people towards. I guess Keith
will just have to start a discussion in news.groups.proposals about it.
>
I've added microsoft.public.dotnet.csharp.general to this discussion,
but I have no idea if Eternal September subscribes to it, which I be-
lieve is what most techies use to access usenet. And the last on-topic
post in microsoft.public.dotnet.csharp.general seems to have been six-
teen years ago.
>
That's a long time for nobody to get comp.lang.csharp running.
>
So please feel free to complain in comp.lang.c -- and let the # be si-
lent -- until someone gets irritated enough to make a proposal that
sticks!
>
>
Best wishes, and happy coding in C#!
this is probably not god taking on this ...the offtopics imo depending on amount (yet quality)..if group has some focus it should be focus on
c realted things with some offtopics possible not focus on c not realted
offtopics with slight amount of c related...
>
so i find some sense in what keith t says though i personally cant agree
with his inner idea this group is only for discussing
>
1) c standards
>
not
2) c ideas
or
3) c programming
want in comp.lang.c. Including meta discussions like this one, about
what should and shouldn't be discussed in comp.lang.c.
>
Plus, it's fairly clear none of the usual trolls code anything in C, as
I demonstrated when I gave you some book recommendations.
>
>
Best wishes, and happy C coding!
so i could eventuall call him back a troll but as i once said if i noticed
it is better to value regular users of this group becouse if not hem
the group culd not exist and i would have no place to talk at all
so i dont call him a troll, becouse he is okay user overally i just disagree in some things
and so on..and which definitions are good and for what reason is a complex thing - not sure if this is resolvable...
generally i find whats good to improve some focus and knowledge here as godo and whats the oposite makin brainless spam is bad etc
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.