Liste des Groupes | Revenir à l misc |
[ X-post list reduced ]
>
On 13.10.2024 18:02, Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org wrote:On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:30:03 -0000 (UTC)>
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) boring babbled:[...]>
No. It translates one computer _language_ to another computer
_language_. In the usual case, that's from a textual source
Machine code isn't a language. Fallen at the first hurdle with that
definition.
Careful (myself included); watch out for the glazed frost!
>
You know there's formal definitions for what constitutes languages.
>
At first glance I don't see why machine code wouldn't quality as a
language (either as some specific "mnemonic" representation, or as
a sequence of integral numbers or other "code" representations).
What's the problem, in your opinion, with considering machine code
as a language?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.