Sujet : Re: Writing Python Code More Concisely Than Perl!?
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.lang.misc comp.programmingDate : 15. Jun 2025, 05:58:03
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <5I-cnV8SK8VOz9P1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 6/14/25 5:25 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> writes:
[...]
Frankly, Python is just generally 'better' these days.
Maybe not AS 'concise' but more 'readable' AND easier
to understand six months from now. The speed is now
'adequate' and Python-4 is supposed to be even faster.
Where are you getting your information? There are no plans for
Python 4.
Nonsense ... search on it.
The PLAN is far fewer diffs than between P2 and P3,
just more optimization.
I'd say expect early releases within a year.
Python HAS become Very Good. Most of the libs
are writ in 'C'. Endless contributors have
added SO much. You can understand it, understand
what you wrote 6+ months ago. It's become one
of the Great Languages.
'C' and near friends ARE faster - I still write
in 'C' sometimes - but Python is just usually
Kinder-and-Gentler and VASTLY supported.
Oh, I remember when 'C' was the COOL NEW LANG
way back in the PDP-11/punch-card days. Still
have my K&R manual - and stick pretty close.
Hey, I can also write some COBOL and FORTRAN, but
generally don't. Can you guess why ? :-)