A library(pio) for the Web 2.0 (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l prolog 
Sujet : A library(pio) for the Web 2.0 (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 25. Jun 2025, 14:17:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <103gssk$18ffa$1@solani.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
Hi,
Why only phrase_from_file/2 and not also
phrase_from_url/2. Its not that difficult to
do, you can do it with change_arg/2 and
nothing else! Lets see what we have so far:
Trealla Prolog:
    Base on memory mapping chars. So basically
    this could be judged as a further argument
    in favor of chars versus codes. But its
    not Web 2.0, works only for files.
https://github.com/trealla-prolog/trealla/blob/main/library/pio.pl
SWI-Prolog:
    Based on turning a stream into a lazy list.
    Requires attributed variables and repositionable
    streams. The stream is opened with open/3 but
    maybe could be opened with http_open/3 as well?
https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/swipl-devel/blob/master/library/pio.pl
To be continued...
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Web 2.0 is all about incremental content!
  > don’t think it could really do
 > the “ghost text” effect.
 It wouldn’t do the ghost text, only assist
it. There was a misunderstanding how “ghost
texts” work. Maybe you were thinking, that
the “ghost text” is part of the first response.
 But usually the “ghost text” is a second response:
  > waiting for completion candidates to be suggested
 Well you don’t use it for your primary
typing completion which is preferably fast.
The first response might give context information,
for the second request which provides a
different type of completion.
 But the first response is not responsible
for any timing towards the second request.
That anyway happens in the client. And it
doesn’t hurt if the first response is
from a stupid channel.
 Web 2.0 is all about incremental content!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Jun 25 * Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon13Mild Shock
20 Jun 25 +* IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)6Mild Shock
20 Jun 25 i`* Re: IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)5Mild Shock
23 Jun 25 i `* timers and tasks testing framework Node.js v20.0.0] (Was: IntelliJ just created Mellum, its open source)4Mild Shock
23 Jun 25 i  `* The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0] (Was: timers and tasks testing framework [Node.js v20.0.0])3Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 i   +- OpenAPI Specification (OAS) goes full Monty [AsyncAPI] (Was: The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0])1Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 i   `- OpenAPI Specification (OAS) goes full Monty [AsyncAPI] (Was: The magical "async" keyword again [Node.js v20.0.0])1Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 +* constant caching test case / Prolog orthodoxification (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)4Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 i`* Teachers have better quality than Nerds (Was: constant caching test case / Prolog orthodoxification)3Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 i `* ISO is loosing it because it gives in to Teachers (Was: Teachers have better quality than Nerds)2Mild Shock
24 Jun 25 i  `- Where APIs Meet AI: Building Tomorrow's Intelligent Ecosystems (Was: ISO is loosing it because it gives in to Teachers)1Mild Shock
25 Jun14:17 `* A library(pio) for the Web 2.0 (Was: Prolog missed the Web 2.0 Bandwagon)2Mild Shock
25 Jun14:19  `- Corr. (Was: A library(pio) for the Web 2.0)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal