Sujet : Re: 50 Years of Prolog Nonsense
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prologDate : 09. Apr 2024, 00:15:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <uv1q99$b8o5$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Remembering Joe Armstrong - 20. April 2024:
https://www.heise.de/news/Hello-Mike-hello-Robert-goodbye-Joe-Zum-Tode-von-Joe-Armstrong-4404170.htmlSome quote:
"Make it work, then make it beautiful, then
if you really, really have to, make it fast.
90% of the time, if you make it beautiful,
it will already be fast.
So really, just make it beautiful!
-Joe Armstrong, Erlang"
Now I have a couple of questions:
- Was Jekejeke beautiful? [No! LoL]
- Is Trealla beautiful?
- Is Scryer beautiful?
- Is Dogelog beautiful? [Yes! LoL]
- Is SWI-Prolog beautiful?
- Is GNU Prolog beautiful?
- Is ECLiPSe Prolog beautiful?
- Is XSB Prolog beautiful?
- Is SICStus Prolog beautiful?
- Etc..
Re: 50 Years of Prolog Nonsense
Re: 50 Years of Prolog Nonsense