Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)

Hi,
Generally I don't believe in things like
SWI-Prolog Janus Python integration. This
type of integration has the advantage
that SWI-Prolog can run in full speed,
on the other hand it has the disadvantage
that one cannot take advantage of Python async,
because SWI-Prolog itself has no async. I
am talking about the single threaded async here.
My experience single treaded async and multi-threaded
Prolog are quite different pairs of shoes. So
when doing the C# backend for Dogelog Player,
I will be faced again to provide a complete
async solution for the async part of Novacore.
Woa!
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
 A few days age we improved the cross referencer,
to deal with the many target platforms. The
old cross referencer for example showed:
 xor/3        nova/Eval.java
              nova/eval.mjs
              nova/eval.py
 Meaning the evaluable function xor/3 is
available in Java, JavaScript and Python.
What we now do, we simply show:
 xor/3        nova/eval.*
 Soon the wildcard will mean C# as well,
and not only Java, JavaScript and Python.
Extending the proof of concept for Prolog
 compiler 100% written in Prolog itself.
 Bye