Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l prolog 
Sujet : Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 10. Aug 2024, 13:46:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <v97ju2$118im$2@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Hi,
To stabilize Dogelog Player now, there
are only a few important pending tickets,
but the growing pains are basically
to identify the low hanging fruits. I
do not tend to throw a dice, it might
take some time doing nothing, before a
next important ticket is selected based
on some rationalization of a priorization.
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Hi,
 Currently I have first hand experience how
difficult it is to model single treaded async
on top of multi-threaded Prolog,
 since I want to bring Dogelog Player async
also to formerly Jekejeke Prolog. It wasn't
so much a problem in the Dogelog Player for
 Java version, since I could replicate the
JavaScript design. But it is a little
nasty in the formerly Jekejeke Prolog case,
 since Thread identity from multi-threaded
Prolog and Task identity from single treaded
async are not the same, you have to dig
 deeper into stackfull and stackless coroutines,
to get the Task identity notion correctly.
I wasn't able to do it yet for formerly
 Jekejeke Prolog, there is still a pending ticket.
 Bye

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Aug 24 * Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?]22Mild Shock
1 Aug 24 +* Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)2Mild Shock
1 Aug 24 i`- ZebralLogic for evaluating LLMs (Was: Alan Kay's Dynabook fueled by Prolog?)1Mild Shock
1 Aug 24 +* Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?]3Mild Shock
1 Aug 24 i`* Biene Maya (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)2Mild Shock
2 Aug 24 i `- A Challenge for Fixpoint Lovers (Was: Biene Maya)1Mild Shock
9 Aug 24 +* Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)15Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 i+* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)8Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii`* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)7Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii `* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)6Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii  `* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)5Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii   `* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)4Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii    `* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)3Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii     `* Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)2Mild Shock
10 Aug 24 ii      `- Re: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable? (Was: Holy Grail makes People Disappear)1Mild Shock
11 Aug 24 i+* The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)4Mild Shock
11 Aug 24 ii`* Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)3Mild Shock
11 Aug 24 ii `* Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)2Mild Shock
11 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: The naive reverse reality check (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)1Mild Shock
13 Aug 24 i`* How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)2Mild Shock
13 Aug 24 i `- Re: How Scryer Prolog became the disgrace of Computer Science (Was: Is Scryer Prologs failure measurable?)1Mild Shock
13 Aug 24 `- Re: Holy Grail makes People Disappear [like Robert Staerk, now Ulrich Neumerkel?]1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal