Newsportal USENET - Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012

Sujet : Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 15. Jun 2025, 08:36:50

Autres entêtes

Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102lt6j$p7mn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird

On 15/06/2025 09:29, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 15/06/2025 04:04, Mild Shock wrote:

So they came up with a patent already in 2012:
<< The conceptual step of converting an abstract
representation (design or specification) of a software
system, into a more concrete representation in the form
of program code. >>
"Already" in 2012? That's the most ridiculous as well
as the least original "invention" I have ever seen...

Talking about this:
Stephen Wolfram, Theodore W. Gray,
"Programming in a precise syntax using natural language"
<https://patents.google.com/patent/US9851950B2>
And the whole cosmos is a computer system, of course!
They just cannot yet figure out who pays the bill...
Get the fuck out of here.
*Plonk*
-Julio

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
15 Jun 25	Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks	9	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration (Was: Biggest Nonsense are Run Buttons in SWISH Notebooks)	8	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 (Was: Theodore W. Gray Patent: 2029-01-09 Adjusted expiration)	7	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012	6	Julio Di Egidio
15 Jun 25	Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012	1	Julio Di Egidio
15 Jun 25	REDUCE 1963 (Was: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012)	4	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S (Was: REDUCE 1963)	3	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow (Was: Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S)	2	Mild Shock
15 Jun 25	Waste of time Java (not JavaScript) for Web (Was: Why forrays into web 2.0 are slow)	1	Mild Shock