Best of both worlds / Franz Lisp GI/S (Was: REDUCE 1963)

Hi,
Concerning notebooks, here is a Franz Lisp thingy
but not yet notebooks, a couple of document windows:
GI/S: A Graphical User Interface
For Symbolic Computation Systelns
Douglas A. Young and Paul S. Wang
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747717187800135
But notebooks are more tidy, aren't they? I basically
wish for a combination of both. Like a feature for
selecting an output cell and detach it from the notebook
into a separate window. This would be swell!
YouTube took a while to provide this for their videos,
mostlikely some notebooks can do that already.
Bye
P.S: The hardware spec of the GI/S host:
Although every attempt was made to keep the design of the
GI/S as device independent as possible, the choice of the
Tektronix 4404 naturally influenced the final design. The
4404 is equipped with 1.9 Megabytes of RAM, a 40 Megabyte
hard disk, and uses a 68000 based CPU running a Unix-like
operating system. The monochrome bitmapped graphics display
provides 480 by 640 pixels resolution on a 9.5 inch by 7.0
inch screen. The 4404 supports Franz Lisp [Foderaro, 1981],
Version 42, which adds flavors, packages, objects,
and other enhancements to Franz Lisp.
Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
 Maybe there is a strategy involved delaying
a start up and patents, until some stuff becomes hot.
 Or delaying stuff until the required hardware
becomes affordable to everybody. Not an issue
 for ChatGPT since it is anyway client server.
But you find GUIs for math symbolic systems
 basically derived from REDUCE in the dozens!
  > The development of REDUCE was started in 1963 by
 > Anthony C. Hearn; since then, many scientists from
 > all over the world have contributed to its development.
 > REDUCE was open-sourced in December 2008 and is
 > available for free under a modified BSD license
 > on SourceForge. Previously it had cost $695.
 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduce_%28computer_algebra_system%29
 Bye
 Julio Di Egidio schrieb:

On 15/06/2025 04:04, Mild Shock wrote:
>

So they came up with a patent already in 2012:

>
<< The conceptual step of converting an abstract
representation (design or specification) of a software
system, into a more concrete representation in the form
of program code. >>
>
"Already" in 2012?  That's the most ridiculous as well
as the least original "invention" I have ever seen...
>
-Julio
>