Jazelle DBX and ARM926EJ-S ~~> Pantilope

Liste des GroupesRevenir à l prolog 
Sujet : Jazelle DBX and ARM926EJ-S ~~> Pantilope
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : comp.lang.prolog
Date : 28. Jun 2025, 00:26:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <103n9bg$1d76g$2@solani.org>
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
Hi,
Back in the early days SUN was already talking
about Java on in CPU. Interestingly this happened:
The most prominent use of Jazelle DBX is by
manufacturers of mobile phones to increase the
execution speed of Java ME games and applications.
A Jazelle-aware Java virtual machine (JVM) will
attempt to run Java bytecode in hardware, while
returning to the software for more complicated,
or lesser-used bytecode operations. ARM claims that
approximately 95% of bytecode in typical program
usage ends up being directly processed in the hardware.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazelle
So in the 90's we had first internet, and then
in the 00's we had mobile phones. The 10's had
big data and early deep leearning.
But Python is still slow as fuck in the 20's.
They should invent a CPU that can do Pantilope,
i.e. direct executon of Python.
Bye

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jun00:26 * Jazelle DBX and ARM926EJ-S ~~> Pantilope5Mild Shock
28 Jun00:27 `* Jeff Barnett might have a point, although he sounds boring (Re: Jazelle DBX and ARM926EJ-S ~~> Pantilope)4Mild Shock
28 Jun00:27  `* www.softwarepreservation.org is less boring than Jeff Barnett (Re: Jeff Barnett might have a point, although he sounds boring)3Mild Shock
29 Jun12:05   `* Is SWI-Prolog backward oriented or forward oriented? (Was: www.softwarepreservation.org is less boring than Jeff Barnett)2Mild Shock
29 Jun12:13    `- Corr. Typo (Was: Is SWI-Prolog backward oriented or forward oriented?)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal