Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?

On 2025-06-26 11:20, R.Wieser wrote:

Alan,
 

So, which game do you think am I playing ?   I don't see it, but you seem
to.  The *least* you could do is to explain what you think you see.

>
How about the one the removes all context so people can't see why I sad
what I said?

 Well, as opposed to you, I think that people are smart enough to figure out
how find the parent post and look for themselves.

Not when you quite deliberately removed the "Reference" header entries...

 

And I see that you have forgotten (again) to defend why you think that
"The
absolute amount of energy involved is negligible.", as currently we only
have that claim, and not even an explanation.

>
You can't do the basic arithmetic involved?
>
OK!

 Ah yes, ignoring my explanation (in the form of two examples) to why that
that equation is a blatant attempt to ignore the problem.  Oh well, I can't
say I'm surprised.
 

I'll just click on the link to the previous post...
>
...oh, wait!
>
You've removed those too!

 What are you doing here if you can't even follow the thread up to the parent
post(s) and look at it for yourself ?

YOU REMOVED THE REFERENCE HEADERS.
Your post started a NEW THREAD!
Let me educate you:
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Ppj_FSXm8u9CV1yxA0DJyuGCmuXh7c8/view?usp=share_link>
That is a screenshot I just took of the misc.phone.mobile.iphone posts in Thunderbird, filtered to only show those with the words "actual" and "advan".
As you can see, there are now three (3) SEPARATE THREADS.
And as you've been contributing to the first of those three for some time, it is clear that the ordinary way you post replies preserves the "References:" header.
Therefore, in your two replies to me where you snipped all context, you have deliberately chosen to remove the references to make it harder for people to fact-check you.
You're really quite the little coward aren't you?
:-)