Liste des Groupes | Revenir à m android |
On 3/15/24 11:21 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:On 2024-03-15 14:40, Jörg Lorenz wrote:[...]On 15.03.24 14:04, Carlos E.R. wrote:On 2024-03-15 13:49, Jörg Lorenz wrote:On 15.03.24 12:34, Carlos E.R. wrote:On 2024-03-15 07:42, Jörg Lorenz wrote:On 14.03.24 21:13, Carlos E.R. wrote:>>>It is so in his country, to my understanding.>
>
The Swiss I know have a tendency to think that the changes applied in
their country have also been applied elsewhere :-D
>
Like no TV over the air.
Very Old Style! We use satellite or fibre-based IP-TV. More
reliable and
much better quality.
Tsk, tsk. Actually, in Spain, some channels transmit in better quality
over the air than via fibre. Just a fact, they do.>>
BTW: Classical TV is a thing of the past.
I know you would say that. But it is not classical TV over here, it is
digital, and it is going strong.
You do not know what classical TV is: Linear TV. Has nothing to do with
digital or not.
Analog TV over the air is dead here; it is probably what you call
"linear TV". Digital TV broadcasted over the air, which is something you
Swiss do not have and probably did not even seriously tried, is
flourishing.
You really do not understand linear TV and modern TV concepts at all.
For your: https://www.vplayed.com/blog/what-is-linear-tv/
Maybe because it is a concept used only by you. Instead of insulting,
you could start the conversation by describing it.
Exactly! His term "classical TV" didn't mean a thing to me, way too
ambiguous. OTOH, I knew what "linear TV" means.
Is it the opposite of logarithmic TV? I've been watching it since 1948
or so and I've never heard that term. OTA?
Now that I know what you mean, I say "no, it is not a thing of the past,
except in Switzerland", which is what I said initially.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.