Re: Comprehensive current zero-day platform comparisons?

On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 12:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

Except you said iphones had already failed the tests in 2022 and android
phones like yours passed with flying colours. So prove it. You don't need
to wait as this is historical "fact".

 
It's 22nd June and instead of Arlen's critical analysis and logic skills
(sic) all we've got is tumbleweed.
 
I guess his unsubstantiated claims, as per usual, were simply hot air.

 <https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>

 1. iPhone Battery = B rated (not A)
 2. iPhone Reliability = C rated (not A nor even B)
 3. iPhone Repairability = C rated (not A nor even B)

Details in this placeholder thread which predicted the EU's new rules will
show how crappy iPhone batteries truly are (they're cheap garbage in fact).

 *Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale*
 <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=59182&group=comp.mobile.android#59182>

Every article shows no iPhone below the iPhone 15 even comes close to the
lifetime charge cycle minimum point - which proves they've sucked for
years.

The iPhone 15 *barely* ekes out past the bare minimum on battery life, but
compare that to most (even cheap) Android phones which easily *double* the
lifetime battery ratings, and you see the proof that Apple puts the
crappiest cheapest lowest-capacity battery it can get away with in the
iPhone.

Do you know why the iPhone battery is cheap crappy garbage?
I do.