Sujet : Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
De : address (at) *nospam* is.invalid (R.Wieser)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.androidDate : 27. Jun 2025, 10:08:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103ln4o$2a0q$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
Marion,
I will always agree with anyone who says something sensible and
logical. No matter who that person is, nor what they may have
said in the past.
Yeah, you have claimed that quite a number of times now. Funny that, the
more someone claimes to be something the less likely he actually is.
Its basic logic: As if he *is* than we would see it for ourselves and he
would need to keep telling us.
To his credit, Rudy understood what an analogy is and what it
does.
Neither Alan nor Carlos understands the concept of an analogy.
Oh, they do. Just like you do. But my own experiences with both you and
Alan tell me that you both will refuse to respond or even deny it when the
message it conveys doesn't suit you.
The very fact that both Carlos & Alan absurdly fought the analogy
instead of understanding the concept, actually indicates a far
larger problem.
Personally I think that people who refuse to respond to even a
simplification of the origional problem like an analogy is supposed to be
are by far the biggest problem.
People who try to mis-represent an analogy can possibly be corrected. The
people who refuse to respond ? Not so much.
If people can't even understand the simplest of analogies of why
a device that has basic hardware can do more than a device that
lacks basic hardware, then no amount of discussion will get that
concept into them.
People who keep hammering their own POV while refusing to listen to and
discuss other POVs will not getting any other concept into them either. pot,
kettle ?
They'll just say all facts are opinions when they can't accept facts.
LoL! You "are able" to recognise it in everyone else (I don't think anybody
here agrees with you), and as such are quite ironically unaware that that
line is defining you yourself.
Regards,
Rudy Wieser